Category Archives: Stocks

2005 is off to a rocky start

This market scares me.

There are always strange internal inconsistencies in markets — efficient markets are a myth — but not usually like this.

6 straight days of down days on the Dow, and the financial news is pinning this on dollar strength and inflation fears. That reasoning does not hold water.

If inflation is the underlying issue, then why are commodity prices falling? Specifically, why aren’t we seeing the flight to quality that normally lifts the price of gold. And if this is a strong dollar story, then why are foreign stock markets falling essentially in line with US markets? And why is the VIX (Volatility index) down? Normally, with trending stocks, the VIX moves up. When the VIX moves down, options prices generally fall.

It’s a strange combination: Stocks down, bonds flat, options down, commodities down, foreign stocks down.

Pure conjecture:

Maybe some big funds had to do some major asset allocation. For example, if i maintain both stocks and bonds at specific percentages of my portfolio, and my stocks went up more than my bonds in 2004, then rebalancing would mean selling some stocks to buy bonds just to keep my asset allocation constant. If the asset allocation included global stocks, bonds, and commodities, then clumsy execution of that kind of trading could lead to the kinds of moves we saw today.

Another possibility might be that large scale selling of global stock markets, commodities, and options (to a smaller degree) by smaller investors is moving capital into US dollar-based cash.

Implications:

Prices are lower and the risks do not seem to have fundamentally changed. However, this feels like a red flag for possible crash in order of 8 to 15%. I’d put those odds at 5% for the next month. If markets right themselves – or at least reestablish their normal linkages – then I’ll feel much more comfortable again, and would overweight international equity beta with a weak dollar emphasis.

International Stock Watch

Exchange traded funds can be a good way to access you international stock markets. This is particularly helpful in markets where you should be seeking broad diversification. EWT and EWH can give you access to the Taiwan and Hong Kong Indices; two markets.

CHU is actually China Unicom. China Mobile is CHL. I hold both, but about 2x as much CHL as CHU. CHU is smaller, more volatile, and between the two, you can cover CDMA and GSM systems in China.

Japan is pretty negative in world view right now, but I still like it very much. I think their currency is overvalued relative to the dollar, and that their stock market is simply not considered by Japanese individuals to be an investment option. Cash is still king there. Also, in terms of international investment characteristics, I think they will become to the rest of Asia in the next 20 years what the United States was to Europe in the last 20 years.

I do like Taiwan. I think that the long term conflict with China will be resolved as China ironically moves more toward Taiwanese policies. They are receiving smart and hard working people like Singapore and Hong Kong. I like all those places. The companies in their indexes probably represent the companies that will be serving major new populations of consumers. These economic centers of influence are the indexes I’m trying to focus on. My time horizon is 10-20 years, though, and I’m sure it will be a bumpy ride.

I sold ECA. I think my positive energy view is really a growth story in electricity, rather than fossil fuels.

Renminbi Valuation

The renminbi is pegged to the US Dollar, and has been for a long time, so what would a revaluation of the Chinese currency mean? Without an exchange rate determined by the marketplace, how can we anticipate the magnitude of the difference between the pegged rate and the appropriate market rate?

It is clear that the yuan is cheap relative to the dollar, but by how much? Our economies are different, and these differences lead to different relative pricing, but looking at a variety of prices can give us some sense of purchasing price parity.

Unskilled Labor:

Textile workers in China are paid about 1/30 of the amount paid for equivalent work in the United States. If this ratio were to equalize through currency revaluation, the yuan would increase by 3000%. However this is almost certainly too high, as China has an oversupply of unskilled labor. This number provides the high-end boundary on the scope of the question.

Gold:

Gold can be purchased in yuan At the time of this writing, $442 worth of gold costs 3670 yuan, implying an exchange rate of about 8.303 Yuan/$. If this ratio were reflected in the currency echange rate, the yuan would increase a negligible amount (Because the exchange rate peg is currently 8.27 Yuan/$). However this is almost certainly too low, as it is illegal for chinese citizens to invest in Gold. This number provides an low-end boundary on the scope of the question.

Basket of goods:

Depending on the basket you select, purchasing price parity implies different undervaluation of Yuan. I estimate approximately 40% undervaluation, clearly with different classes of goods and services.

Trading:

Under a fair and open market, I envision a 40% inflation on Cinese imports would greatly imporove the stature of US companies that have been drowning under Chinese import competition. Similarly, Chinese companies that earn their revenues from Chinese will see a US Dollar denominated revenue increase of 40%.

[UPDATE 1/25/2005]

Senator Lindsey Graham, (R) Judiary Committee and

Senator Charles (Chuck) Schumer, (D) Finance Committee

are announcing bill to impose a 27.5% tarif on Chinese imports, implying their view that the Renminbi is near 27.5% discounted against the Dollar.

[END UPDATE]

Let’s speculate that Chinese currency will reflect market forces within 2 years. In this speculative possible environment, investors might benefit from:

underweight Chinese companies with revenues largely based on exports

overweight Chinese companies with revenues largely based in China

underweight US companies who import from China

overweight US companies who compete with Chinese imports

Now let’s speculate that Chinese currency will remain pegged to the US Dollar. In this speculative possible environment, investors might benefit from exactly the opposite positions.

How can the US exploit a currency peg that is clearly an unfair trade practice?

Cut taxes and issue more debt.

This increases the Federal deficit, diminishing the value of the US Dollar, and also increases the after-tax pay rates for US workers.

Telecom Watchlist / Industrial Evolution

There are clear innovations and implementations of current technology that can be safely called inevitable. One of these is ubiquitous wireless. We will be surrounded by secure broadband available by subscription, and compatible with wireless devices. Wireless devices compatible with broadband will include laptops, PDAs, phones, and electronics built into vehicles, etc.

If this is true, then some industries will join the buggy-whip industry:

Phone companies: why pay for phone service if your wireless phone is a tiny part of a cheap broadband service. Internet traffic incurred by telephone quality duplex audio is a drop in the bucket.

Cable providers: If I have access to streaming video straight from the media companies, why pay a cable company for anything? I might pay HBO for access to their channel, but there is no room for Comcast. The old line between broadcast and cable TV will be irrelevant.

Traditional and Satellite Radio: Internet radio is already catching on. When devices and wireless grow to maturity, there is no need for radio. Your music preferences will be targeted much more specifically than a set of 20 FM stations can satisfy, making the listening experience far better. The 2-way directionality of streaming radio (broadcasters know what IP addresses are listening, and when) make the value proposition for advertisers far better. Finally, the global nature of IP eliminates the problems of range and signal quality.

I don’t mean to sound gloomy, in fact, this is not a gloomy forecast. Leaving horse drawn buggies for cars was a major milestone in economic advancement. So too, leaving single-application wires for IP-based wireless broadband is going to be a great milestone. Communications technology is the lubricant of innovation and trade. I would expect global growth to accelerate into these advancements, and remain at a generally accelerated pace thereafter.

In this speculative possible state of the world, investors might benefit from:

underweight companies with revenues largely based on phone, cable, and radio

underweight traditional-radio advertising companies

overweight equities

overweight internet advertisers and IP-intelligence aggregators

overweight internet applications providers

The Myth of Negative Sentiment

Today’s article in Barrons: “The Myth of Negative Sentiment” took the position that negative sentiment in the investor community is a myth, and that the media is unnecessarily sugarcoating economic problems.

I think the article missed the point.

The sugarcoating is not for the investor crowd, it is for everyone else. Investors stand to do well as we move toward an “ownership society“, but the non-investor class is disenfranchised and falling further behind. I’m talking about the concentration of wealth and the distribution of consumption.

The article talks about how investors are heavily invested in equities rather than cash, and how this is a signal of investor optimism. This is true; it is because dividend and capital gains rates have been cut in half (or more) and interest rates on cash accounts are almost zero. Why hold cash when the yield curve is steep and tax rates are so favorable? After-tax investment returns look very promising.

But if you live paycheck-to-paycheck (Barron’s readers might not have any contact with these people…) then your prospects are grim. In the past, debtors could count on inflation to depreciate their past sins. But these days, deflation threatens to put them deeper in debt while giving the wealthy more buying power. Meanwhile social services are being cut and the lions share of tax breaks are going to people making capital gains and receiving dividend income. For them, the whole country is becomming a company town.

The issue is not negative sentiment on the part of investors, but rather social depression. And that is no myth.