Google is requiring that G+ customers use their real names.
A vocal group has been fighting this requirement in a growing protest known as “Nymwars“.
Google’s requirement is based on their plan to use G+ as an identity service while the nymwarriors demand that real identities are sometimes used by oppressive regimes to stifle free speech and track political activists.
Google’s position violates the “Don’t be evil” code. It also ignores an important market demand: profile management. G+ should allow real people with real names to create public profiles of any nickname they like. These nicknames would be persistently attached to the account, and bad behavior could remain accountable, but real people could remain anonymous to the public to avoid retribution or political oppression.
It’s usually a good idea to give users what they want, and in this case, Google could use this opportunity to become a new kind of identity provider: one that supports private links between private citizens and their public profiles.
This is what I love about looking at past blogs because you can see what was going on back in 2011 and look at what is happening now and see such a difference.
Just on July 15, 2014 Google apologized for all the unclear and unnecessary “crap” it has put its users through. Really! Basically what Google did on July 15, 2014 was remove all restrictions on what name you can use.
I guess Google realized they were on the wrong side of the real name war….
Yeah. Nailed it. 🙂