Category Archives: Public Policy

Connecticut To Store Biometric Information

I just got word that when I renew my driver’s license, I will have to submit to allowing the CT DMV to store biometric information, as well as smile for facial recognition software from Viisage to be able to continue driving. With national law enforcement agencies opening up their databases to each other, survailance systems such as cameras in public places will be able to identify my face and build a general path of the places I’ve been. Recordings of sufficient quality can probably be analyzed to build the path retroactively. Hmmm.

W3C Approves Web Privacy Standard

The World Wide Web Consortium has approved the Platform for Privacy Preferences, or P3P, a standard that would allow browser software to automatically compare a user’s privacy preferences with the privacy policies of a visited web site.

Outside-the-box Economics

The US, Japan, and other countries have converging economic policies which are not optimally stimulating growth within their national economies. The following is an attempt to eliminate inefficiencies and improve incentives: a discussion point, not a recommendation.

Eliminate all taxes, and print the money that the government needs to handle it’s budget. Tax would be implied by the inflation of the currency. The US government’s annual budget of $1.864 Trillion in 2001 represents a small portion of the total US assets and capital. I don’t know the total number–I’m not sure if anyone does–however, GDP in the US is $9.8 Trillion. With a total US currency capital base of only twice GDP, the marginal increase in money supply would be about 10%. M3 (The broadest indicator of money supply, including bank deposits and money-market mutual funds) rose by almost 14%, year-on-year, to the end of October, 2001, meaning that the US gov’t annual budget would add another 42% to the increase in M3. Meanwhile inflation is about 3%. If we increase the inflation rate by the same factor, we get 4.25% inflation. And no taxes.

The stimulation of the economy would be furious for a few reasons: 1) Elimination of taxes increases disposable income by 50% (assuming 33% average tax, which is probably low), 2) an increase in inflationary expectations creates an increase in spending, and 3) enormous increases in efficiency.

In terms of efficiency, the entire IRS and tax calculation and collection processes would be unnecessary. In addition, the legal complication surrounding estate taxes, loopholes, alternative minimum taxes (AMT), purchase basis tracking, tax avoidance, foreign tax safe-havens, audits, etc. would become unnecessary.

Sales taxes, including targeted taxes to discourage some goods or behaviors could (and should) still be used.

Currently, there is no tax on wealth. Instead, taxes are paid for income, sales, and other movements of capital. The current mechanism creates an inefficiency in a huge range of transactions. Inflation, on the other hand, is an effective tax on wealth, and in doing so, eliminates the inefficiency on transactions while discouraging hoarding and encouraging investment and spending.

The base of wealth is so much higher than the base of incomes that taxing wealth can bring in the same revenues with a much lower tax rate. Closing all the loopholes and eliminating inefficiencies should also boost tax revenues substantially.

Globalization

Improvements in communications and distribution of goods and services

Leads to

Increased benefits to the lowest marginal-cost producers,

And therefore

Increases the volume supplied by the lowest marginal-cost producers.

Concentration of production

Leads to

Concentrations of wealth

Concentrations of wealth

Lead to

demographic and cultural changes.

Also,

Increasing supply from the lowest marginal-cost producers

Leads to

lower prices.

Lower prices

Lead to

Reduction or elimination of the profit potential for less efficient producers,

and therefore

reduces the number of producers

As the number of producers shrinks

And

The distribution volumes of the lowest marginal-cost producers increases,

Then

The ratio of employees to employers increases.

This demographic shift

Leads to

a gradual, or sometimes rapid, cultural shift.

In addition,

Economies of scale (a core strategy in the minimization of marginal-costs)

Lead to

consolidation.

Gloablization has clear advantages as measured by efficiency and profitability, however, also involves the consolidation/alignment of cultures, practices, language, currencies, and other social and demographic factors.
If people want to lessen these cultural shifts caused by globalization, the dynamics or boundaries of capitalism would have to be modified:
either economies of scale would have to be disassociated with competitive advantage, or the regulations concerning consolidation and/or distribution will have to be more restrictive.
The first option is not realistic, and the second option would limit freedom to trade. Neither option appears very attractive.

Samurai Technocrats

Samurai Technocrats are committed to improving humanity through championing technological tools and systems. There was a premature rise and fall of this class in the internet boom that rung in the 21st century, as many individuals — and eventually groups — began to work and build businesses that were designed to create utility and not just capital.

The conditions that create samurai technocrats are financial security, embracing of innovation, freedom of communication, and broad generosity.

In the 21st century, anonymity will become more optional, and so samurai technocrats will emerge from obscurity.